<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proof-Editing Shakespeare Entry from Encyclopaedia Britannica 11th Edition</title>
	<link>http://blog.openshakespeare.org/2007/09/19/proof-editing-shakespeare-entry-from-encyclopaedia-britannica-11th-edition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.openshakespeare.org/2007/09/19/proof-editing-shakespeare-entry-from-encyclopaedia-britannica-11th-edition/#comment-1955</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.openshakespeare.org/2007/09/19/proof-editing-shakespeare-entry-from-encyclopaedia-britannica-11th-edition/#comment-1955</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;jean: thanks for the suggestions. We haven't considered the mechanical turk so far because of the need to pay money (we're pro bono publico and are volunteer based).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We've definitely been considering pgdp.net (see discussions on the mailing list). However for the time being given that the whole piece is only 30 pages we thought it better just to 'put it in a wiki' and do it on a volunteer basis rather than have to go through the pgdp.net process. However as I said we've been considering pgdp and may submit there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jean: thanks for the suggestions. We haven&#8217;t considered the mechanical turk so far because of the need to pay money (we&#8217;re pro bono publico and are volunteer based).</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve definitely been considering pgdp.net (see discussions on the mailing list). However for the time being given that the whole piece is only 30 pages we thought it better just to &#8216;put it in a wiki&#8217; and do it on a volunteer basis rather than have to go through the pgdp.net process. However as I said we&#8217;ve been considering pgdp and may submit there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jean</title>
		<link>http://blog.openshakespeare.org/2007/09/19/proof-editing-shakespeare-entry-from-encyclopaedia-britannica-11th-edition/#comment-1954</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.openshakespeare.org/2007/09/19/proof-editing-shakespeare-entry-from-encyclopaedia-britannica-11th-edition/#comment-1954</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Could Amazon's mechanical turk be used for this? 
  http://www.mturk.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could Gutenberg's distributed proofreaders system be useful?
  http://www.pgdp.net/c/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Amazon&#8217;s mechanical turk be used for this?<br />
  http://www.mturk.com</p>
<p>Could Gutenberg&#8217;s distributed proofreaders system be useful?<br />
  http://www.pgdp.net/c/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
